bunt sign

Wednesday, October 20, 2004

Gambling on tribal lands has exploded over the last few years, and the spillover is an ugly thing to see. Indian gaming rights have been pretty much co-opted by Nevada casino owners (and you know what that means). Any altruistic or humanitarian motivation for allowing tribes to run gambling venues is gone.

Maybe we still think of the California gambling industry as part of reparations to Indian nations disenfranchised by the U.S. government in the nineteenth century, but if that was ever really the case, it no longer is.

So what can we do now? We can try to contain it, we can tax it, and we can regulate it. Unfortunately, neither of the gaming-related measures on the November ballot does anything to bring the situation under control.

Proposition 68 would allow racetracks and card rooms, where gambling is currently legal in California, to expand to allow slot machines as well. In other words, wherever the specified racetracks and card rooms currently exist, we can expect to see big Nevada-style casinos being built.

The measureís smokescreen window dressing is an increase in fees paid to the state on gambling winnings. I donít think itís worth bringing this kind of business into our neighborhoods, and Iím voting no. (Iím not the only one, apparently, because the polls show that this proposition is trailing so badly that those funding it have pull out of the race.)

Proposition 70 is even worse. It would expand gaming, exempt tribes from state environmental laws, require smaller tax payments from them, and remove any requirement that they negotiate with local governments. And all of this would be unaudited and written into the form of 99-year renewable compacts. It doesnít smell very good, does it? It smells like roulette, and it smells like craps.

This is a horrible measure that shouldnít even be on the ballot. I suspect that thereís a guilt complex at work here. Something must have encouraged so many people to sign the petition, and I canít imagine it was common sense, because if theyíd read it they surely wouldnít have endorsed it. Itís another example of the ridiculously porous initiative process that clogs every California ballot with ideas that should be debated and rejected in our legislature.

20 October 2004


Fortunately, there is one easy choice on the ballot. Proposition 71 would fund stem cell research. This is exactly the kind of thing government should be doing, for the general welfare of the public for generations to come. Itís money we spend now that could eventually save us even more money in reduced health care costs. And itís something Washington is either too narrow-minded or too timid to do (depending, I guess, on which side of the aisle you sit on).

previousbunt signemailnext


Iím guessing that when the Yankees beat the Red Sox 19-8 last Saturday in Boston, they were pretty confident. They had just gone up 3-0 in the best-of-seven ALCS, and they knew that the pitcher they would face in game four was a guy the Red Sox manager didnít even want in his starting rotation. But Derek Lowe kept his team in that game long enough to allow them to come back and win. And then they won another one and another one, and it all came back to Lowe in tonightís game seven. And he crushed the Yankees, giving them just one hit in six innings. And the Boston offense hammered Kevin Brown and a succession of high-priced Yankee pitchers. And they won the game, 10-3, and they won the series, and theyíre going to the World Series and the Yankees arenít.

Recent recommendations can always be found on the links page.

One year ago: Shady
"It was pretty much as unpleasant and depraved as I thought it would be. It's just not my cup of herbal tea."

Subscribe to the notify list to be advised when this site is updated.